Alright America, are you ready for another outrage? If you are any kind of conservative you need to be sitting up and paying attention, because this is truly ridiculous. Organizing for America is now encouraging people---progressives, uber-leftists, etc--- to call in to conservative radio talk shows with the intention of completely overwhelming them with left-wing talking points. Essentially, they want to hijack conservative talk shows for the sake of promoting “liberal” or “progressive” propaganda, particularly in the healthcare debate.
“The fate of health reform has been the focus of debate in living rooms and offices, on TV and online -- and on talk radio. And since millions of folks turn to talk radio as a trusted source of news and opinions, we need to make sure OFA supporters are calling in with a pro-reform message.” That is directly from the website, "On the Air." One could argue that President Obama has nothing to do with the website (though it bears his name in its url address) since Organizing for American is “a project of the Democratic National Committee…[and] this communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.” However, does anyone really believe that Obama is completely unaware? Do you really believe that our president is that ignorant that he is unaware of what OFA is doing in his name?
The website provides “OFA supporters” with tips for calling, as well as talking points. Callers are encouraged to share “a personal story about how health reform affects [the caller] and [his/her] family” as a “great way to show the importance and urgency of health reform.” The talking points, says the site, “are only to provide extra information and suggestions. Your personal story will make the most compelling message.”
Not only does this site encourage people to flood conservative shows with “a pro reform message,” but it gives them direct access. Step 1 displays the logo of a show currently on the air, with a link to a free web-radio. For some shows, there is even a “call for free” allowing you to call from your computer through Skype at no charge. Anybody else think this is ridiculous? “If you can’t get through, don’t worry!” say the calling tips. “If the show you call is busy or not accepting calls at the moment you call in, simply click ‘Give me another show’ to find another.”
When I first saw the site Sean Hannity’s show was on the front page as a target. After flipping through a few hours later (aka, hitting ‘give me another show’ repeatedly) I saw shows like Michael Medved, Glenn Beck, Dennis Miller, The Wall Street Journal This Morning, and of course, Focus on the Family. Seriously? Focus on the Family?
I also noticed several more liberal leaning shows on the hit list. Some would use that to argue that this proves the website is not an attempt to as I said, hijack conservative talk radio. On the contrary, I contend that it is simply camouflage. No one needs to call in to liberal shows to promote healthcare reform, as the liberal shows, generally, do it all on their own. The real targets here I the people I listed above. Michael Medved. Glenn Beck. Dennis Miller. Sean Hannity. Savage. Limbaugh. Focus on the Family. Actually, let’s throw the entire Moody Bible Institute’s radio productions in there for good measure.
Any way you slice it this is ridiculous. These people are calling shows they may not have even heard before, simply to push “a pro-reform message.” If the listeners of the conservative talk shows wanted to hear “a pro-reform message” they’d go watch MSNBC! It is one thing if you are a regular listener to a show, or happen to flip through the stations and hear something you want to challenge, and you then call in and pick a fight with the talk show host. Fine. However, if you’re calling in just to push talking points on me, then get off my radio!
Friday, February 26, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Your two final criticisms -- a) that callers who do not regularly listen have no place in offering their views on a talk show and b) that this offends the sensibilities of regular listeners because they tune in to hear conservative talking points -- are inconsistent. A "pro-reform message" is the same when advanced by a regular listener or an OFA volunteer. It is, for that matter, impossible in most cases to tell the two apart simply by listening.
ReplyDeleteYour ideas of the purpose of talk-programs are, to say the least, bleak. What a dim view you take of public debate! Liberals tune in to Station A, conservatives to Station B, the two camps have their biases affirmed, and go to bed an hour later. Open discussion and opposing viewpoint are gone: not merely weakened by hosts uninterested in their guests opinions or expertise, not merely debased by inane shouting matches, but completely absent. They have, at long last, finally starved to death in Mr. Minow's vast wasteland. The notion that “If the listeners of the conservative talk shows wanted to hear ‘a pro-reform message’ they’d go watch MSNBC!” does not conceive of broadcast media as a forum, but a cocoon, in which tens of thousands may sit and listen without fear of dissent or disagreement. The thought of someone seeking a channel to air a contrary view is more than "ridiculous;" it is an "outrage."
Worse, the breadth of what counts to your mind as "talking points" is astonishing. By OFA's own instructions to callers they ought share their own personal experiences. Personal experience -- human experience -- is not a talking point. My grandfather needed to move into an assisted living home recently as a consequence of (bungled) surgery and that has left him mostly paralyzed. He has, even with health insurance -- with premiums that, on average, rose 131% in the past decade (for point of comparison, the rate of inflation was 28%)(1) -- needed to sell his house to pay for necessary care. He is not a talking-point. Going door-to-door in our most recent presidential election 2008, I was invited into the home of a woman who could not afford the medication she needed, even after assistance programs, and promised that she would vote were she healthy enough to leave the house on the 4th. She is not a talking-point. One is entitled to an opinion, but one is not entitled to callously shut their ears to the hardships of fellow citizens and shrug their pain off as “ progressive propaganda.”
-----
1. Average Family Health Insurance Policy: $13,375, up 5%, U.S.A. Today (Sept. 16, 2009).
I have no problem with honest people of a more liberal viewpoint calling in to a conservative radio show and sharing their stories. That was not the point of the post. What I have a problem with is a project of the DNC giving talking points (which are listed on the website) and calling tips and telling people who otherwise would NOT call a radioshow to do so. I stated quite clearly that the OFA website says the talking points "are to provide additional information." This push by the OFA seems dishonest to me.
ReplyDeleteFurther, I would never shrug off another's pain as "progressive propaganda" if it were indeed true. I do not doubt your story. However, many of the "stories" that have been shared by politicians and left-leaning news organizations have turned out to be false, or at the very least severely exaggerated. Still, as a person who believes very strongly in small government, I do not believe it is the governments job to relieve that pain. Which is why I can't walk past a Salvaton Army bell-ringer at Christmas or miss out on a food drive at church.
I have no problem with debate. Unfortunately, debate has been largely stifled. Other than the largely criticized FOX news and conservative radio, right-leaning people have little forum for their ideas and concerns. The Republicans' ideas about health care (I am NOT a Republican, but that is another topic for another day) were not even given a nod until the health care summit, which was just a horse and pony show. Debate is great, but I don't want to see conservatives' voices taken away from them by people who don't care about debate, only getting "free stuff."
I will admit that my view portions of the liberal population is skeptical at best. Though in personal life I try very hard to look for the best in people, in politics I have a tendancy to look for the worst. I don't trust Washington with my health, or that of anyone else, and I don't trust a group that feels their message has to be on every single station in the country.
Oh, and I almost forgot! Thank you very much for the post! It's nice to know people are reading, even if they don't agree.
ReplyDelete